It doesn't all start with engagement

I was reading a post on change11 the other day and this video was talked about. The essence of th video is that in education these days we've gone crazy with assessments and we forget about th learner. Fair enough, I believe that this is indeed true in some states and school systems, especially with things like no child left behind.

The problem comes in (for me at least) when the people start talking about engagement first, and not learning objectives or something to assess. They actually see the assessment/objective first as wrong, and this is where they lose me. As educators we need to start off with a certain goal in mind, once th goal (end state acquisition and/or behaviors are known) we can then decide how we would check for these behaviors. Yea, I am putting assessment in second because it's important to know how we will be assessing what we want out learners to know.

Once we've worked out goals and assessment methodology, we can then move onto content, perhaps not 100% of th content, but a sizable amount that constitutes a core, additional content will be determined after the learners have been determined and they strengths, needs, and interests as determined. You can think of several possible scenarios while developing these materiala. Learner engagement comes in at the end once you know who your learners are.

I am getting a vibe here that these folks are overreacting to poor implementation of a good method, and to unresponsive teaching. Just because the water is dirty, you don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Engagement is a very important factor in education, but it is not ncessarily the starting point, at least not in classrooms of 15+ students. It may, however, be interesting from a tutor or homeschool perspective where you've got one on one time, and usually loads of it.

The Essence of Connected Learning from DML Research Hub on Vimeo.

 

Comments

Indeed. I've seen little proof that engagement helps with the kind of learning that can be demonstrated as achievement. Assessment, though, can be better integrated into the learning experience than it has been. It might even be possible to "teach to the test" when the test is a flexible learning activity rather than a static, summative assessment. 
Super Video.  These are the questions that need to be discussed. 
In community college most (certainly not all) students are there for the degree...not the learning.  That is because the don't connect to what is being "delivered".
Grades are the currency of schools.  So assessments are the best way to both achieve the learning outcomes and motivate the student to put forth his best effort.

Learning, both content acquisition and assessment, has to be active.  The topic and the mode of assessment (a video rather than a paper) meaningful to the student. 
Technology enables teacher to offer individualized, personalized learning experiences that will engage the learners and let them connect to the content.

Popular posts from this blog

Academic Facepalm (evaluation edition)

Discussion forums in MOOCs are counter-productive...well, sort of...

Latour: Third Source of Uncertainty - Objects have agency too!